Posted with Master’s permission
Member Blog post · General
For the past couple of days bana has participated in what she perceived as public comments that were open to all. At times these comments turned into rather passionate debates which is to be expected considering the issues. bana in her attempt to speak in generalities apparently struck nerves and caused some to feel attacked. That was not the intent. None the less it happened. This one will NOT, she repeats will NOT, apologize for her real life opinions and beliefs. What bana will apologize for is sharing her thoughts with those who are incapable of acknowledging that everyone doesn’t share the same view. The mistake was to dare to comment with a different point of view. The mistake was daring to question so called facts that conveniently appear. As for real life opinions of the typist behind bana. Well let’s just say that there are very very few people here who have even the faintest glimpse into that person. To be blunt form your opinions, make your judgement, break whatever ties you need to, be disappointed...do what you feel you need to do. Respectfully, Well Wishes.

Comments
26 comments on this post.
I've never once, ever, heard or known bana to be disrespectful to anyone for any reason. Some people, on the other hand, are just emotionally fragile whiners, products of a sheltered life, who look for any reason to be offended just for an excuse to seek acknowledgement. They've been "hurt" so they need to be recognized and consoled when the fact is it was just the attention they wanted the whole time. bana, anyone who knows you knows you speak truthfully and directly from the heart.
Thank you Master
One can not debate an opposing view without acknowledging it. Acknowledgement, however is not by necessity agreement. If the facts you are referring to are regarding Trump's ineligibility for draft and related issues, they appeared from research. If you mean her interpretation of those facts, that is of course debatable. Glimpses of what you think well hidden are provided by your conduct. In this case it was your manner and method of debate that brought disappointment, not your political views.
What's fifteen inches long, covered with semen and hangs between Barack Obama's thighs? Warren's necktie.
One can always count on you for the infantile, Haigan. By the way, did you take advantage of the learning opportunity I provided so you could educate yourself as to the nature of the political system under which you live? I'm curious if you will continue to deny that the U.S. is a democracy when a document produced by the U.S. government itself states directly that it is.
Thank your Jarl for your time to post your opinion. With respect, bana was giving her views on a subject posted. bana’s manner and delivery gives cause for personal remarks? This one is sorry Jarl she does not see the correlation.
The manner and method was to either outright ignore what was said, or to gloss over the meat of the post and pick up on a select few words and choose to use them how you saw fit. The fact that in all the years that you have been bana, I have never once seen a time where you cherry picked from a person’s comments, no matter the topic. In doing so over and over, not only was it insulting, it was tiresome and that is the cause of the utter loss of respect that I had for you.
If it was possible to post the documents that I found in my research into the comments, I would have happily done so. Being that it isn’t, I did the next best thing available to me, I typed out everything that I read from them. I grew tired of repeating myself when you continued to refuse to acknowledge that the facts that I shared were actual, public records that either came from the National Archives or from radio, print or televised interviews with the man himself.
Instead, you insisted that it was conjecture, made up stories, convenient rumors delivered to ruin the sterling reputation of a man
Never once did I state that any other past president was better because of what they did or didn’t do differently. In fact, the closest I came to even stating that Trump was “bad†was in my statement regarding grabbing women by the pussy.
I pointed out that the method in which he went about avoiding the draft was questionable, followed by researching the facts of his avoidance and posting said research. You repeatedly selected only what you wanted to read from that research, calling it half-truths or conjecture followed by throwing out some other president’s flaws that really had nothing to do with the topic at hand. That, dear bana, is called deflection.
As for feeling attacked or struck nerves, well maybe this was regarding another conversation you were having. I won’t even call it a debate because an actual debate tends to have facts and discussion of opinions as opposed to just ignoring what one side has said.
You should never apologize for sharing your beliefs. It would be nice though if you’d also be willing to listen to those of others and acknowledge that they have brought more than rumors and make believe to back up said beliefs.
I don’t know the typist behind bana, you don’t know the typist behind sevda. I stated that I don’t know what happened to the bana that I have always known, as I said earlier, the manner and method in which you carried on was unlike any other I have ever witnessed over many years.
I wasn’t going to comment any further, but since it appears that you were bothered by the outcome of the previous conversation, I decided to make one final response. From this point forward, believe what you wish, but kindly do not make assumptions, nor put words in my mouth (so to speak).
I wish you well.
bana appreciates your clarification sevda. she was not trying to imply you made up stories rather that bana doesn’t believe everything that is in the news. It is your right to do so. There are mistruths on both sides of these discussions. bana was not cherry picking but rather pointing out things that stood out to her. However you made It personal. you have made your feelings very clear that’s fine .
You didn’t make a “final response†sevda. You made a long 6-7 (I didn’t count, I wasn’t interested in your diatribe to be honest) response that didn’t cover any new ground or make any new statements. I’m also not sure why you disparage bana so readily. She’s 14x the person you are. Here or in real life. Don’t like what you read? Don’t respond. Simple.
I share sevda's disappointment in your manner of debate, though not the intensity. Due to your many years of insightful and well considered posts on matters related to Gor, I had expected your style of political debate would be similarly top notch. That you chose to adopt a lesser standard instead after demonstrating for so long you are capable of more is perplexing.
Thiery, sevda's single response was made over several posts, due to the formatting and space limitations of Buzzen blog replies. My girl disparaged bana's manner of debate, and shared her disappointment over it and her resulting shifts in opinion. That may sound to you the same thing, but there is a distinction. You know virtually nothing about my girl, here or in real life. You are no position to evaluate her. You are similarly in no position to dictate her posting.
Theon,
I will say that you know nothing of bana. Here or real life. You and your posts and her and her posts and worthless opinions are allowed here, on this blog because of me. One nod and all your disparaging moronic opinions are gone. You and her will be returned to the dustbin of obscurity from which arrived. Remember your place and I’ll allow you to remain here.
I know of what bana is capable, so know when she could do better if so inclined. As far as your ability to control the blog of your slave, such is common knowledge. As far as remembering place, practice what you preach and refrain from attempting to instruct that which you do not own. Removal is a meaningless threat when one can simply create their own blog on which to comment. So, whatever Dreary (as pet names seem the order of the day).
On my slaves blog I will instruct anyone I wish. Including you and your slave. Your collective panties are just in a twist because bana didn’t respond the way you wanted her to. As for creating your own blog? Knock yourself out. Hopefully it will happen quicker than the northern paradise you were supposedly going to open 3 years ago. I’m sure building permits are hard to get though, especially when you just aren’t that interesting. and “Dreary†I shouldn’t expect better from you, but wow.
Put some thought into it.
Sure, instruct all you like, and those instructions made beyond the validity or your reach will be ignored as I like. Your estimate of my degree of concern is akin to your sense of self-import. Exaggerated. Eh, as for the nickname, you'll have to merit some degree of creative thought before I expend it on you.
The only outcome sevda, is that we disagree on politics, if that makes bana a bad person she wears that hat proudly. Here’s a deflection, we agree to disagree, you can ignore what you deem as tiresome unintelligent comments which will save you future disappointment and your world will be right again. bana wishes you and your Jarl many happy years together